page contents
 
Picture
I have recently been very critical of Congressman Ron Paul on WeArePolitics for a myriad of different reasons that main one of which is that I feel that he is very detrimental to the Republican Party.  A party that he has absolutely no loyalty to nor allegiance.

Paul, as I have written before, has run a slash and burn campaign in Iowa, and it is certainly working for him....At the expense of a few of the other candidates and in particular former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.  Paul's campaign has been running non stop ads in Iowa about Newt that contain outright lies.  Over the last few weeks, Paul himself has come under the scrutiny afforded to the front runner status as the infamous newsletters that he has tried so hard to hide have reared their ugly heads again.  In recent days, there has been an orchestrated internet effort to link the dsiclosure of these newsletters to Speaker Gingrich.  (For the record, these newsletters were released first in1996 by Paul's opponent Lefty Morris, although there are a lot of folks who falsely think that they came from Republican primary opponent Charles Laughlin who Newt Gingrich endorsed.  The newsletter letter story pretty much died out until they resurfaced again when a writer for The New Republic named James Kerchick wrote an article in 2008 called "Angry White Man".)

Paul has refused to take responsibilty for the newsletters claiming he didn't write them and didn't even bother to read them.  His supporters argue that he was a busy doctor at the time to bother himself with the trivalites of a newsletter with his name on them.  Yet they want him to be President and leader of the free world.  Makes sense huh?  There has also been a concerted, organized effort to try and blame Speaker Gingrich for the release of the newsletters.    As I have already stated, the newsletters have been out there for years.  Further, Paul supporters are claiming that since Kerchick is a Fellow at The Foundation for Defense of Democracies and that Speaker Gingrich is a member of the think-tank's Leadership Council, Newt had something to do with getting the newsletters out there again.  Sorry to disappoint you again, but Kerchick was just named a Fellow in November of 2011.  The article was written in 2008.  There is no connection.  Quit fishing for something that isn't there.

Picture
Photo from James Kerchick's Original Article
Since the newsletters re-release, Paul has been endorsed by David Duke along with Don Black, both of KKK fame.   The scary part isn't the actual endorsements, but the fact that Paul refuses to disavow them.  It should come to no surprise though.  This is a guy who just went to the 50th Anniversary celebration of the John Birch Society. You remember them don't you?  They're the ones Conservative icon William F. Buckley virtually got thrown out of the GOP back in 1964.)  Oh yeah....and as for Don Black, Ron Paul refused to give back a $500 donation from him back in 2007.  The fact that Congressman Paul won't repudiate Black and turn his back on him should come to no surprise in light of this either then.

Now, onto the Constitution that Congressman Paul and his supporters throw in the GOP's face at every opportunity that they can.  I have been accused on several occasions of just 'slinging mud' and being a 'crap-stirrer'....So let's dissect a few of the Congressman's policies as they relate to the Constitution.  Congressman Paul wants to do away with the Federal Reserve, right?  Everywhere we turn, we hear him and his suppporters preaching to END THE FED....  Further Ron Paul and his supporters will argue with you til the death about his social policies.  I hate to break it to them again....The Constitution of the United States of America does not give the President the authority to dictate the economy nor social policy.  It reads:

"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session."

That's it gang....That's the ONLY powers per the Constitution afforded to the President given by The Founding Fathers. 

I agree with Michael Medved who wrote last week,

"This means that those who back Paul's domestic policies but ignore his isolationist, moral-relativist approach toward America's position in the world are actually saying they care more about presidential roles not specified in the Constitution than they do about the chief responsibility the Founders themselves had in mind. Dr. Paul wants America to play a less robust leadership role in the world—apparently agreeing with Barack Obama, but disagreeing with great Republicans Lincoln and Reagan."

I sincerely hope that the people of Iowa don't fall for the bait and switch, slash and burn tactics of Congressman Paul and his campaign.With Iran stating that they now have their first nuclear fuel rod, can we afford to leave them alone anymore as Congressman Paul suggests we do?   He does not and will not represent the VAST majority of our party and the sooner that we as a party realize it the better. 
 


Comments

Valerie
01/02/2012 12:29

This stuff is really tiresome, Bill. The least you could do is post one of the numerous youtube videos where black people come to Paul's defense to try to provide some semblance of fairness. I guess non-thinking people will just take this drivel at your word. If anyone would like a link to a touching video google 'Ron Paul' and 'Compassion.'

Reply
Bill Knowles
01/02/2012 13:38

Valerie, if you'd like to post a link in the comments I have no problem with it. I've kept every rebuttal that has been offered.

Reply
01/02/2012 14:12

Bill, The Federal Reserve System is unconstitutional. Stealing is unconstitutional. Much of what the federal government does is unconstitutional. Are you calling for a return to the US Constitution and rule by just law?

"I have never believed there was one code of morality for a public and another for a private man." Thomas Jefferson

Reply
01/02/2012 14:17

Bill you really are grasping. You are infected with Paul Derangement Syndrome proven by the fact you are willing to risk your good name and reputation.

The only cure is to read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Then ask two simple questions;

1. Does the Constitution give Congress the right to bomb people all around the world without a declared war?

2. Does the Patriot Act, TSA, Department of Homeland Security and the NDAA 2012 eviscerate our liberties and freedom?

Happy New Year!

Reply
Bill Knowles
01/03/2012 08:54

Bill,

Since you and most of the other Paul supporters love to bring up the founders and Thomas Jefferson....The First Barbary War was not a declared war by Congress....Neither was the Second declared by James Madison....ANd don't forget the Quasi-War that John Adams 'declared'...Learn your history before throwing your bombs as well.

In answer to #2....Yes...they infringe on our rights. No question. But sometimes we have to sacrifice individual liberties for the sake of the common good. I would rather granny get held up for a few extra minutes in the airport than have her blown out of the sky.

Reply
01/02/2012 21:29

bill, if you had even one single ounce of patriotic blood flowing through your veins, you wouldn't say the idiotic things that you do, and you might actually understand the value of an organization like the John Birch Society. My father was a member of that organization for many years, and it is an insult to his memory for you to demean them.

why don't you just write a blog admitting that you are a statist to the core. that you worship the authority and power of the federal government, and that you go to bed at night with an uncle sam doll tucked up under your arm.

I seriously think you, and those like you, are mentally ill. i have come to the conclusion that this society has gone insane. people like you are the symptom. those of us who support Ron Paul actually recognize the truth. we are sane, and of course, you and your ilk label US as "insane."

you are like a cancer cell that has drifted away from the main tumor, attempting to infect the rest of us with your poison. asking government to fix anything is like asking cancer to cure itself.

RON PAUL AND HIS SUPPORTERS ARE THE CURE. I don't really blame you. You will resist the cure just like any cancer cell. But, know this....the cancer will be destroyed. One way or another.

Reply
Bill Knowles
01/03/2012 08:39

VERY nice. If Ron Paul is the cure, you are completely right and I would rather die from the disease.

The name calling is so becoming...statist......insane....mentally ill.. You missed calling me a neocon...I know it's in the Ron Paul handbook...See Blake and David below...

Reply
Blake S
01/02/2012 23:27

Lame. I just don't see how you can show pictures of TJ and RR at the top of this page, yet bash the only candidate who fully supports the Constitution. Newt is simply another NeoCon war mongering fear pusher.

Reply
01/03/2012 00:58

Bill Knowles is a piece of sh**. He is a Bush Neo-Con. Dont waste your time on this worthless piece of sh**.

Reply
Bill Knowles
01/03/2012 07:57

Great comment David! It really adds a lot to the debate! Thanks for your insight.

Reply



Leave a Reply